This topic started to take shape after a Mastery member shared an ethical dilemma she faced at a recent dog show, leaving her feeling disheartened and even a little angry. These situations aren’t isolated; I’ve heard similar stories from various exhibitors. While some of these issues feel like ethical dilemmas, they are really governed by AKC Rules. However, the real challenge lies in interpreting these rules when the language is vague or the rules seem unenforceable. How do we navigate the grey areas where personal ethics and official guidelines intersect?
Consider the use of supplements, for example. Is giving a dog a supplement to enhance performance crossing an ethical line, or is it just a part of preparing for competition? And are we sometimes focusing so much on these details that we overlook more critical issues, like breeding for the overall health and longevity of our dogs? Without clear enforcement mechanisms, these situations often become ethical dilemmas, left to the discretion of exhibitors, judges, or handlers. So, where do we draw the line, and how can we uphold the integrity of our sport while navigating these complex situations?
Curious Question: When we present a spayed bitch or use neuticles, are we respecting the integrity of the sport, or are we manipulating perceptions for our advantage?
AKC Rule Reference: Chapter 11, Section 8 states that a dog that is spayed, castrated, or has artificial testicles is disqualified from competition.
Why It Matters: The essence of Conformation shows is to evaluate breeding potential. Showing a spayed bitch or using neuticles to give the illusion of intactness undermines this fundamental goal. It suggests these dogs can contribute to the gene pool when they cannot, misleading both judges and the breeding community. Misrepresenting a dog’s reproductive status erodes trust and goes against the spirit of honesty and accuracy that AKC Rules are meant to uphold. By crossing these ethical lines, we risk compromising the genetic health of our breeds and the integrity of our sport.
Curious Question: When does enhancing a dog’s appearance cross into unethical territory? Is there a difference between temporary touch-ups and permanent alterations?
Why It Matters: The AKC Rules are clear on this as well. Chapter 11, Section 8-C states: “dogs with changed natural color or markings cannot compete or win awards. Judges must withhold awards and report any violations; both handlers and judges could face disciplinary action.”
Using permanent dye doesn’t just break the rules—it creates a false impression of what the dog looks like. Even with temporary products, it’s important to be mindful. We’re here to showcase our dogs’ natural beauty, not to mask it. Sticking to these guidelines helps to ensure we’re honoring the true spirit of competition and upholding the Standards that make each breed unique.
Curious Question: What do we owe our dogs once they’ve retired from the ring? Is euthanizing a healthy dog simply because it’s no longer useful acceptable?
Why It Matters: There might not be an official rule against euthanizing healthy retired dogs, but ethically, it’s indefensible. Our dogs are more than just showpieces; they are loyal companions who have given us their best. Choosing to euthanize a healthy dog rather than finding it a new home sends the message that these animals are disposable. Rehoming retired dogs allows them to enjoy a well-deserved rest and a fulfilling life after their show careers, reflecting the compassion and responsibility that should guide every breeder and exhibitor.
Curious Question: At what point does using substances to calm a dog cross into unethical behavior? How do we differentiate between enhancing performance and altering behavior?
AKC Rule Reference: Chapter 11, Section 8: “No dog shall be eligible to compete at any show and no dog shall receive any award at any show if… Additionally, any substance used to enhance or improve a dog’s natural temperament, gait, or appearance, or which has the incidental effect of doing so, is prohibited.”
Why It Matters: Back in the 1980s, giving dogs a bit of honey for an energy boost before Group judging seemed harmless. One might make the argument that the honey altered the temperament of the dog, therefore it is no different. However, using tranquilizers or CBD to alter behavior reaches a new level and raises ethical concerns about misuse of pharmacological drugs and mood altering substances. If a dog needs these to stay calm, perhaps it’s not suited for the show environment. Beyond fairness, a dog that is unstable could endanger judges, other dogs, and spectators if the dog reacts unpredictably. Ethical competition means showing dogs as they are naturally, not altering them through artificial means.
Curious Question: Does the absence of a disqualification for size or weight (where guidelines exist) in Breed Standards mean it’s acceptable to show dogs that don’t meet these guidelines?
Why It Matters: Even if a Breed Standard doesn’t have a specific disqualification for size or weight, ignoring these guidelines undermines the breed’s integrity. Size distinctions often tie directly to a breed’s purpose and functionality. Both breeders and judges are responsible for upholding the Standards to preserve each breed’s unique characteristics. Adhering to size and weight guidelines helps to maintain clarity and fairness in the ring, and honors the history and function of the breeds we represent.
Curious Question: How far are we willing to go to compete? Is it worth risking the health of our dogs and others just to step into the ring?
AKC Rule Reference: According to Chapter 11, Section 9, “No dog with a communicable disease shall be on the show grounds or premises. Exhibitors should follow their veterinarian’s recommendations to ensure that their dogs are free of internal and external parasites, any communicable disease, and have appropriate vaccinations.”
Why It Matters: The welfare of our dogs must always come first. Showing a sick dog not only jeopardizes its health but also poses risks to other dogs and people. Ethical showing isn’t just about the competition; it’s about demonstrating responsibility and compassion. By prioritizing health, we protect our dogs and maintain a safe and enjoyable environment for everyone involved in the sport.
These ethical dilemmas strike at the heart of who we are as exhibitors, breeders, and stewards of the sport. Our choices reflect our values and shape the standards of our community. Addressing these issues ensures dog shows remain fair, honest, and respected, showcasing the best our breeds offer. It’s about more than winning; it’s about upholding the integrity of our sport, safeguarding our dogs’ well-being, and fostering a community based on trust and responsibility. Let’s commit to making choices that honor our dogs, adhere to the rules, and elevate the standards of our sport. By doing so, we reflect the very best of what it means to be part of the dog show world.
